scanman’s posterous

stuff that's too long for twitter & not really apt for my blog 
« Back to blog

Conditional Parenting - NYTimes.com

In 2004, two Israeli researchers, Avi Assor and Guy Roth, joined Edward L. Deci, a leading American expert on the psychology of motivation, in asking more than 100 college students whether the love they had received from their parents had seemed to depend on whether they had succeeded in school, practiced hard for sports, been considerate toward others or suppressed emotions like anger and fear.

It turned out that children who received conditional approval were indeed somewhat more likely to act as the parent wanted. But compliance came at a steep price. First, these children tended to resent and dislike their parents. Second, they were apt to say that the way they acted was often due more to a “strong internal pressure” than to “a real sense of choice.” Moreover, their happiness after succeeding at something was usually short-lived, and they often felt guilty or ashamed.

In a companion study, Dr. Assor and his colleagues interviewed mothers of grown children. With this generation, too, conditional parenting proved damaging. Those mothers who, as children, sensed that they were loved only when they lived up to their parents’ expectations now felt less worthy as adults. Yet despite the negative effects, these mothers were more likely to use conditional affection with their own children.

This July, the same researchers, now joined by two of Dr. Deci’s colleagues at the University of Rochester, published two replications and extensions of the 2004 study. This time the subjects were ninth graders, and this time giving more approval when children did what parents wanted was carefully distinguished from giving less when they did not.

The studies found that both positive and negative conditional parenting were harmful, but in slightly different ways. The positive kind sometimes succeeded in getting children to work harder on academic tasks, but at the cost of unhealthy feelings of “internal compulsion.” Negative conditional parenting didn’t even work in the short run; it just increased the teenagers’ negative feelings about their parents.

What these and other studies tell us, if we’re able to hear the news, is that praising children for doing something right isn’t a meaningful alternative to pulling back or punishing when they do something wrong. Both are examples of conditional parenting, and both are counterproductive.

an article that's worth reading and thinking about for all parents with young children.

maybe it's time we relearnt how to raise our kids!

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments (2)

Sep 16, 2009
Heidi Allen said...
hurrah for this article. i like it very much, and isn't this also the case whether we have children or not that we respond better when we are liked for who we are not what we do
Sep 16, 2009
Francesca said...
"What these and other studies tell us, if we’re able to hear the news, is that praising children for doing something right isn’t a meaningful alternative to pulling back or punishing when they do something wrong. Both are examples of conditional parenting, and both are counterproductive."

I'm not quite getting what it is to learn here. This has been common sense advice and talked about for years with no resolutions. Is this the whole article? If so where is the alternative these Psychologists conclude will lead to non-conditional parenting. We are not to offer praise or discipline?

I find many of these studies are started but never offer any real foundation for new approach. If Parents are to offer non-conditional parenting they are to first understand how their parenting is reflective of parenting they received.

I find it counterproductive to dish out band-aid psychology advice to Parents on Parenting without any consideration for Parents well being. Let's not forget Parents were once children. All though they are all grown up they will never complete a good parenting course by reading a white washed New York Times article citing a five year old study from another country.

Cookie-cutting psychology is a bad move. There are cultures, religions and much more that needs to be considered and discussed.

Leave a comment...

 
Got an account with one of these? Login here, or just enter your comment below.
Posterous-login    Connect    twitter